Using Retrofitted EVLA Antennas with the VLA
Last Revised December 28, 2007, 2007
Previous revisions of this document can be accessed via the
EVLA Returns
Archive.
While NRAO is in the process of building the EVLA, EVLA antennas
are being retrofitted and returned to the operational VLA. These
antennas are operated in a transition mode that does not yet have all
VLA features available, and the antennas may be less reliable than
unmodified VLA antennas. As information about the inclusion of EVLA
antennas into the VLA becomes available it will be posted at the links
below and updated on a regular basis.
NEW More information
on the aliasing problem (December 17, 2007)
NEW Latest news on 25
MHz spectral line correlator offset problem (November 16, 2007)
Modcomp computers replaced (October 19,
2007)
Including Retrofitted EVLA Antennas in
Observations (December 28, 2007)
Known Problems and Solutions/Workarounds
(October 2, 2007)
Extended C-band coverage available on EVLA
antennas (October 23, 2007)
Extended K-band coverage available on EVLA
antennas (January 12, 2007)
Guidelines for post-processing EVLA data
(October 5, 2007)
Aliasing in narrow bandwidths
General description
The hardware used to convert the digital signals from the EVLA
antennas into analog signals to be fed into the VLA correlator causes
power to be aliased into the bottom 0.7 MHz of baseband. This affects
all sources with continuum emission, most notably, commonly-used gain
calibrators. The aliased power is strongest at the very bottom of
baseband, and decreases away from baseband. For all bands except X
and U band on the VLA, the bottom of baseband is at low-numbered
channels. For X and U band, the bottom of baseband occurs at
high-numbered channels. This problem obviously affects the narrowest
observing bandwidths the most, with bandwidth codes 6 (781 kHz total
bandwidth, typically the narrowest commonly used on the VLA) and
higher being affected over the full width of the band. Although we
are investigating ways to mitigate this problem, it is likely that the
effect will remain with us until the new EVLA correlator comes online.
In fact, the problem will affect more and more baselines as more VLA
antennas are retrofitted to EVLA antennas. Note that since the
aliased signal does not correlate on VLA-EVLA baselines, only
EVLA-EVLA baselines are affected.
Impact on observing
A necessary condition for aliasing to occur is that there be emission
between 0 and 0.7 MHz below the bottom of baseband. This is generally
the case for continuum emission but rarely so for line emission.
Nonetheless, aliasing has the following consequences:
- Whereas the actual line emission may not suffer from aliasing
directly, the phase and bandpass calibrators are continuum sources,
and will therefore be affected
Since the calibrators are continuum sources, aliasing will occur, and
potentially affect the calibration. It is therefore important that in
determining the calibration, all data from EVLA-EVLA baselines be
ignored. This can be done by flagging all EVLA-EVLA baselines prior
to calibration, e.g. by using UVFLG with OPCODE='FLAG' and a unique
choice for the adverb REASON. Note that in this way EVLA antenna
gains are still being determined, but based on VLA-EVLA baselines
only. After the full calibration (including bandpass) is complete,
the EVLA-EVLA baselines need to be unflagged, again using UVFLG, now
with OPCODE='UFLG', and the same value of REASON as was used when
flagging them.
For subarrays containing only EVLA antennas the above will clearly not
work, and methods for calibrating these data are under investigation.
- In most cases, the field of view will contain both line and
continuum emission, and removing the continuum requires extra care
The aliased continuum can be subtracted in the visibility plane using
the AIPS task UVLSF, just as has been common practice in the past for
data not affected by aliasing. However, in order to fit the shape of
the aliased continuum, a high order fit is needed. The latest version
of UVLSF now supports orders up to 4, and users will need to make sure
they have run a Midnight Job since October 31, 2007, to obtain this
version. It is our experience that a fourth order fit is required and
sufficient to properly represent the aliased continuum. Note that
while the line signal can be recovered this way, this is not the case
for the continuum as there is no way to separate the aliased part of
the continuum from the unaffected part. We have received reports,
though, that running BLCAL can improve the resulting continuum, but
this requires frequent observations of a strong calibrator.
Clearly, a higher order polynomial fit will only work if there is a
sufficient number of line-free channels at either end to base the fit
on. We recommend that at least one-quarter of the total bandwidth at
either end is line-free. In other words, the total number of channels
with line emission should not exceed 50% of the total number of
channels.
A successful fit requires aliased signal to base the fit on. This may
not be the case if the field of view does not contain strong continuum
sources. We are considering implementing AIPS software that will
perform the UVLSF fit on calibrators only, and subtract a properly
scaled version of this aliased response from the source data. In
anticipation of such a task, we strongly recommend all spectral line
observers planning to use narrow bandwidths to give higher weight to
strength than to vicinity to the source, when deciding which phase
calibrator to use.
Note that it is almost certainly impossible to stitch together narrow
bands to obtain wider frequency/velocity coverage for wide spectral
lines, because there is no way to subtract the aliased continuum
signal in this case. Also, the line emission below baseband will be
aliased into the band in an unpredictable way depending on the shape
and strength of the emission line.
- In all cases, noise is aliased into the band and will decrease
the effective sensitivity, with the channels closest to baseband
being the most affected.
Spectral line 25 MHz Correlator offset now avoided
We recently demonstrated that the correlator offset problem present
in 25 MHz bandwidth spectral line observations is being triggered by
the so-called self-test in the correlator. We were unable to detect
any offset in a three hour run taken with self-test turned off. As a
result, self-test has been turned off automatically for all 25 MHz
bandwidth spectral line observations taken after November 8, 2007.
Note that these offsets have never been observed at bandwidths other
than 25 MHz, and for those other bandwidths self-test will remain on,
as before. Because the correlator self-test is now
turned off during all 25 MHz spectral line observations observers need
to check their data very carefully, and notify us if there are problems
as soon as possible.
For observations taken before that date, the effects of the offset can
be removed during post-processing provided there is no emission of
interest in the center of the field. See the
relevant section in the post-processing chapter for more details.
Modcomp Computers retired on June 27 2007
The Modcomp computers, for decades the workhorses of the VLA realtime
system, were retired on Wednesday Jun 27, 2007, as planned. This
completes an important step in the transition from the VLA to the
EVLA. A much more modern online system, which has gone through
extensive testing in the last few months, has taken over
While we have done all we can to ensure that the most commonly used
modes work under the new system, we ask our users to inspect their
data extra carefully, and let us know of any unexpected effects as
soon as possible
A number of problems or limitations related to having two different
systems controlling the array have disappeared:
- Now that only one system controls both VLA and EVLA antennas the
original reason that Doppler tracking was not supported on VLA - EVLA
baselines has disappeared. However, the presence of phase jumps on
VLA - EVLA baselines at frequency changes remains, and we still don't
recommend Doppler tracking unless one observes EVLA - EVLA baselines
only.
- When moving to the first source in an observation, VLA antennas
and EVLA antennas will now choose the same wrap
- For non-dynamic observations, durations are an acceptable
alternative again to stop times. Note that for dynamic observing,
durations continue to be mandatory
Two errors were discovered in how the new system calculates u,v, and w
coordinates. The data in the archive were corrected retroactively,
and no further correction during post-processing is needed. Observers
affected by this have been notified by e-mail.
A few observing modes are not supported yet, but we intend to have
them operational by the time scheduled observations require them.
These include support for planetary observations, and phased array
observations. Multiple subarrays are supported now, but all subarrays
must have the same correlator mode (e.g. 2AC), bandwidth, integration
time, etc. In case of a conflict, the settings of the subarray with
the largest number of antennas will be used for all others.
Including Retrofitted EVLA Antennas In Observations
SUMMARY
As of 1 August 2006 we changed the mode by which EVLA antennas are
given to observers. Beginning on that date, all observing programs
have been given the EVLA antennas that have returned to operations,
and are listed in the table below. We believe that the antennas
returned to operations will likely give reasonable data most of the
time, if the guidelines appearing on this page are followed; but this
is not guaranteed. For a list of the main known problems in using the
EVLA antennas and their solutions/workarounds click here.
- The following retrofitted EVLA antennas are currently available
(or, if in red, are scheduled to be included shortly), for use in
the following frequency bands:
Antenna
| Pad location B-array
| Pad location C-array (proposed)
| Band
|
---|
74 MHz (4) | 327 MHz (P) | 1.4 GHz (L) | 5 GHz (C)
| 8.4 GHz (X) | 15 GHz (U) | 22 GHz (K) | 43 GHz (Q)
|
---|
14
| E16 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 16
| W24 | | n
| n | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 13
| N16 | | n
| n | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 18
| N64 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 24
| W12 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 26
| N40 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 23
| E36 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 17
| W28 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 21
| E20 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 19
| W4 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 11
| E32 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 25
| N24 | | Y
| Y | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | Y
| 1
| Master Pad | | n
| n | Y
| Y | Y | n
| Y | n
| 4
| AAB | | n
| n | n
| n | n | n
| n | n
|
- EVLA antennas will be automatically included by default in an
observing program. If EVLA antennas are not
wanted, then an explicit message to the VLA operator should be put
in the comment field at the beginning of the observe file, such as
"Please do not include EVLA antennas in this observation."
- The observe file remains the principal way for observers to
instruct the array what to do and when. In particular, the //LO
card continues to be used to tune the local oscillators. For the
EVLA antennas, which have a completely different LO chain, the LO
card settings are used to derive an observing frequency, from which
optimal EVLA settings are derived. This is transparent to the
observer.
- Observe files should be sent to the data analysts at least one week
before scheduled observing to be checked to make sure they command
the EVLA antennas properly.
- The sensitivity of the EVLA antennas may differ from VLA
antennas by tens of percent. Therefore, observers should take extra
care to calibrate the data weights (DOCALIB=2 in AIPS, actually any
DOCALIB > 0 and < 100 in 31DEC06)) whenever using EVLA antennas.
(We recommend this step as well even when EVLA antennas are not
used.)
- The EVLA bandpass is enough different from that of the VLA that
about a 6% closure error is present on EVLA-VLA baselines in
continuum modes using 50 MHz bandwidths. This closure error will be
larger in continuum modes at narrower bandwidths. The closure error
can be mitigated by observing a strong source with known structure
and using the AIPS task BLCAL to determine baseline-based closure
corrections. For observers who are interested in continuum
observations for bandwidths of 25 MHz or narrower we recommend the
use of spectral line mode (i.e. pseudo-continuum) rather than
continuum mode to be able to correct for these closure errors.
- In principle, under the new Modcomp-free system it would be
possible again to get meaningful data on crossed (VLA - EVLA)
baselines while Doppler tracking, but for the fact that the
potential for phase jumps at small frequency changes remains.
Therefore we continue to recommend to use fixed frequency observing
for those projects that need the crossed baselines (when using EVLA
- EVLA or VLA - VLA baselines only, Doppler tracking is supported,
as before). See the documented Doppler workaround
recommendations and/or the Online Dopset
Tool . We suggest that, after reading these documents, line
observers consult with a VLA staff person before submitting their
first observe file. For questions or concerns about creating
Observe files using EVLA antennas (whether line or continuum),
please e-mail our
support staff.
GENERAL ISSUES
- Users should inspect data from the EVLA antennas particularly
carefully, since not all the online system flags are currently
operating for these antennas, and some of the other problems
mentioned under Current Known Problems can
result in data that need to be flagged. At present, flags are set
for antennas that are off source, mispositioned subreflectors, and
synthesizers that are out of lock.
- The new online system should no longer erroneously flag good
data. Some observers may want to inspect all data regardless of
flagging by the online system by using CPARM(2) = 1 and CPARM(3) =
16 in FILLM.
- We strongly recommend that Observe files (for the VLA or the
EVLA) should be written entirely in J2000 coordinates. However,
B1950 coordinates work and have been tested for the EVLA
antennas.
- Observe files for regularly scheduled projects can now be in
stop times or in durations. Observe files for dynamically scheduled
projects must be in durations
- The planned availability of the various bands on the EVLA is
shown in this graph. Interim L
and interim C-bands are not equipped with Ortho Mode Transducers
(OMT), and therefore have poor polarization properties outside the
'old' L and C band ranges (1.25 - 1.75 GHz for L-band, and 4.5 - 5.0
GHz for C-band)
- No EVLA antennas have the VLA U band (15 GHz) frequency
available. U band receivers will begin to be installed on EVLA
antennas in 2011.
SPECTRAL LINE OBSERVATIONS
- Though under the new Modcomp-free system, cross-correlations
between EVLA and VLA antennas with online Doppler tracking have been
shown to work again, we still cannot recommend this since the
potential for phase jumps at frequency changes remains. Therefore
we continue to recommend to observe in fixed frequency mode unless
only VLA or only EVLA antennas are being used. Note that we
strongly recommend a calibrator scan between any change in frequency
- Doppler tracking corrections can be applied to data taken in fixed
frequency mode using the routine CVEL in AIPS.
OBSERVATIONS AT MULTIPLE FREQUENCIES
- The phase jumps on VLA - EVLA baselines introduced by changes in
observing frequency and/or observing bands should be tracked by
observing a phase calibrator every time there is a frequency or band
change in the observing program. Generally, source scans should be
bracketed by a phase calibrator scan using the same band, local
oscillator, and Fluke settings.
OBSERVATIONS AT K AND Q BANDS
- The EVLA high-frequency performance is not as good as that of
VLA antennas, due to a combination of issues that have not been
completely resolved which includes pointing, subreflector
positioning, and focus.
- Observers at high frequencies should take the following into account:
- Tipping curves for opacity determination are not implemented
on the EVLA antennas. In most cases this will not affect users,
who at this point should probably be using the opacity corrections
derived from the weather data that are calculated by FILLM in AIPS
when running with the default BPARM=0.
- Antenna gain curves as a function of elevation are not yet
available for the EVLA antennas, and subreflector focus and rotation
with elevation is not yet implemented. Thus the gain response versus
elevation is likely to be significant, and to change on relatively
short timescales for these antennas until the retrofits are complete.
These effects can to some extent be taken into account by observing
your primary flux calibrator at an elevation as close as possible to
that of your phase calibrator, so that its flux can be bootstrapped
while minimizing systematic elevation-dependent offsets. The routine
ELINT in AIPS can also help to alleviate elevation-dependent gain
offsets between your source and phase calibrator.
- Secondary reference pointing was implemented and tested on EVLA
antennas in mid-July 2006. Observers should pay careful attention to
their secondary reference pointing results on EVLA antennas, and
report any apparent problems.
AVAILABILITY OF OTHER OBSERVING MODES
- Primary and secondary reference pointing work with EVLA antennas
- Fast switching works with EVLA antennas.
- Multiple subarrays are now supported. Note that all subarrays
must have the same correlator mode, bandwidth, integration time, etc.
In case of a conflict, the settings of the subarray with the largest
number of antennas will be used for all others. For example, if the
largest subarray has correlator mode 2AC and 6.25MHz bandwidth, all
subarrays will use mode 2AC and 6.25MHz bandwidth.
- Use of B1950 coordinates has been tested and is currently
working
- Observations of moving objects (such as planets) with the EVLA
antennas is currently not implemented but efforts to make it
available are underway
- Solar observing with the EVLA antennas is currently not
implemented
- It is now possible to include EVLA antennas as part of the
phased-VLA for VLBI. Observers should be sure to phase up often
during a phased-array experiment, and to inspect their data
carefully during data reduction. Since it takes a minimum of 30
seconds to phase up, phasing scans should be 30 seconds plus the
amount of time it takes to detect the source for VLBI purposes.
- The High Time Resolution Processor is not available with the
EVLA antennas
OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES FOR OBSERVERS
- The EVLA L band (20 cm) and C band (6 cm) feeds are new. Their
properties are not yet well determined. In particular, the variation
of polarization across the antenna beam has not been measured.
- Use of the round-trip-line-length monitor data is not
implemented. The net effect is a diurnal term in the antenna phase.
Not a problem (except for astrometry) with reasonably frequent
calibration.
- Bad data may not be flagged, especially near scan start.
Observers can expect the need to examine the baselines including EVLA
antennas much more carefully than is needed for unmodified VLA
antennas, and they may need to flag their data more extensively
(perhaps using the task QUACK in AIPS) at the beginning of each
scan.
- EVLA antennas do not control feed heaters. Expect problems with
frost or dew on the feed covers if relative humidity approaches
100%.
Known Problems and Solutions
The following lists the main known problems in using the EVLA
antennas and their solutions/workarounds:
Known Problems (in red) and
Solutions/Workarounds (in black)
- During the period June 27 to August
29, reference pointing solutions were not applied to antennas 1 -
9
In high-frequency observations
taken during this time period antennas 1 - 9 should be excluded
when deriving the flux calibration in GETJY
- Antennas sometimes fail to get
organized during the first scan.
For any observation, add a dummy
first scan. Typically, this would be a short scan on the first
source, and would be followed by the actual scan on that source.
Though the first 'dummy' scan could in principle be of arbitrarily
short duration, JObserve will insist on a non-zero dwell time for
that scan
- The online system that runs the
EVLA antennas does not know, a priori, where the antennas will
start out at the beginning of an observation. This means that if
an observation begins in the overlap region of the azimuth wrap
(-85 to 85 degrees, or 275 to 445 degrees) the VLA and EVLA online
systems may choose different wraps. Once both sets of antennas
have observed a source in the south, or if an antenna wrap card
(//AN) specifying explicitly the wrap to use is encountered in the
observe file, they will be synchronized again. For more on
antenna wrap, click here.
To avoid the potential loss of
synchronization at the beginning of an observation that starts in
the overlap region, and the subsequent need for one set of
antennas to "unwind" at some point during the observation, add an
antenna wrap card to the first scan of the observe file by
selecting either the Right or Left wrap on the scheduling page in
JObserve. Be aware that if the previous observation ended in the
overlap region of the azimuth track on the opposite wrap from that
selected for the first scan of your observations the antennas will
have to unwind, which could take 10 minutes or more. This extra
time needs to be included in the first scan.
- Changes in the (VLA) fluke
synthesizers are known to cause phase jumps on VLA - EVLA
baselines and are therefore a transition issue
On any frequency change, however
small, bracket the source scan by calibrator scans at exactly the
same frequency (fluke settings). Note that this also precludes
use of Doppler tracking as the resulting frequency shift will
cause phase jumps.
- Closure errors of up to approximately
8% on EVLA-VLA baselines in 50 MHz continuum mode due to
non-matched bandpass shapes. The closure errors on narrower
continuum bandwidths are larger.
Observe a strong source with known
structure (could be your amplitude calibrator) and use the AIPS
program BLCAL to determine baseline-based closure
corrections. Preliminary tests using this method reduced the
closure errors for the EVLA-VLA baselines by an least an order of
magnitude (in 50 MHz continuum mode). For narrower band continuum
observations, it is probably best to observe in spectral line
(pseudo-continuum) mode.
- EVLA antennas lack Tsys values
In order to obtain a Tsys value for
EVLA antennas use the VLA back-end Tsys, which can be obtained by
setting CPARM(2) = 2 in FILLM.
Finally, we encourage users to give us feedback as soon as
possible after their observations. Any questions prior to observing,
and feedback afterward, can be e-mailed to our support
staff.
Extended C-band coverage available on EVLA antennas
New C-band frequencies
Most EVLA antennas currently in the array (see the table in the relevant section for the current status) have
the new wide-band C-band receivers installed, which can be tuned
outside the traditional VLA C-band range (4.5 - 5.0 GHz). Tests show
that meaningful results can now be obtained from 4.2 - 4.5 GHz and
from 5.0 - 7.7 GHz as well. For this reason a special
call for exploratory proposals to use this new C-band capability
has gone out with an April 9, 2007 proposal deadline. The rms (in
arbitrary units) as a function of frequency between 5.5 and 8.0 GHz is
plotted here. The features at 6.0, 6.4,
and 7.9 GHz are resonances which we expect to go away once the Ortho
Mode Transducers (OMTs) are installed some time in 2008.
A plot showing the K value against frequency is shown here at higher frequency resolution than
the figure referred to above. This plot covers in detail the range
from 5900 to 6700 MHz. This range was chosen since it is not only
there that the resonances occur, but it also contains the familiar OH
lines at 6031 and 6035 MHz and the Methanol line at 6668 MHz. See the
Observational Status Summary for a definition of the K-value.
Note that at outside the traditional C-band range polarization
information is lost, as illustrated by this
figure showing the ratio RL/RR for two baselines for an
unpolarized source. Note that only between 4.5 and 5.0 GHz this ratio
is close to zero, as expected for an unpolarized source. Polarization
observations won't be able to exploit the extended frequency range
until the installation of the OMTs.
To illustrate the opportunities this new frequency range offers, we
observed a number of maser lines in W3OH. In figures 1 - 3 we show
their scalar cross-power spectra on one of the EVLA - EVLA baselines.
Figure 1 shows the 6030.747 MHz OH line, figure 2 the 6035.092 MHz OH line, and figure 3 the 6668.5192 MHz Methanol line. The
flux density scale is indicated below the plot; because of a lack of
accurate calibrator flux densities at these frequencies we did not
perform any flux calibration; we expect true flux densities to be
about 40% higher than the y-axes indicate.
Those interested in observing outside the traditional VLA C-band
should be aware that only data from EVLA antennas can be used - VLA
antennas will not produce useful data at these frequencies. Also, no
polarization information can be obtained. Finally, JObserve does not
support the creation of the required observe files; see the following
section for more information.
Observe file preparation specifics
Since observations at the new C-band frequencies can only be done
with EVLA antennas, there is no danger of introducing phase jumps
caused by the small frequency changes while Doppler tracking, on VLA -
EVLA baselines. Under these circumstances, Doppler tracking is
possible again.
When Doppler tracking, the EVLA LO chain is tuned based on the sky
frequency derived from date and time, rest frequency, and velocity.
In that case, values on the //LO card will be ignored; in fact, the
whole LO card can be deleted. (In fixed frequency observing on the
other hand, values on the LO card are required in order to calculate
the sky frequency).
Since JObserve does not support the new frequencies, we suggest
preparing the observations using rest frequencies JObserve does
allow, and modify the observe file at a later stage. The steps are:
- using JObserve or observe, prepare the complete observe file using,
e.g., the 4829 MHz formaldehyde line
- choose 'write observe file' and exit JObserve
- using the editor of your choice, replace all occurrences of
the 4829 MHz rest frequency in the observe file with the one you
want. The format is very specific, so make sure the new frequency
appears in exactly the same fields as the old one
- Don't use 'no change' as a synthesizer setting option, as it
will cause the frequencies of the data to be mislabeled. If the
difference in sky frequency is not important, use Doppler tracking
instead, with the same velocity as used for the source. If the
difference in sky frequency is important, use Doppler tracking
with a different velocity which leads to the same sky frequency as
the source. This velocity can be determined using our Online Dopset
Tool .
- it is highly recommended to run the observe file by
our support staff before submitting it
Notes:
- After editing the observe file by hand, do not read it back into
JObserve, since JObserve will not be able to handle some of the modified
entries in the observe file
- if for some reason you do not want Doppler tracking, you will need
to specify the appropriate LO settings directly in the observe file.
If this is the case, please contact our support
staff
Subarrays
Support for multiple subarrays under the Modcomp-free system has been
implemented as of mid-September, 2007. Note the following:
- for dynamically scheduled observations, use of only one subarray
is allowed
- When observing in line mode under the new system, the restrictions
have become more stringent: for all subarrays, the correlator mode,
bandwidth, etc. must be identical. If they aren't, the settings of
the subarray with the largest number of antennas will override the
settings for all other subarrays. For example, if the largest subarray
has correlator mode 2AC and 6.25MHz bandwidth, all subarrays will use
mode 2AC and 6.25MHz bandwidth. If you plan to use multiple subarrays
in line mode we strongly encourage you contact a local expert.
Extended K-band coverage available on EVLA antennas
Most EVLA antennas currently in the array (see the table in the relevant section for the current status) have
the new wide-band K-band receivers installed, which can be tuned
outside the traditional VLA K-band range (21.2 - 25.2 GHz). Recent
tests show that meaningful results can be obtained from 18.1 - 26.5
GHz, with a small penalty in performance at the extreme ends, as shown
in this figure, which plots the rms
(in arbitrary units) averaged over the four IFs as a function of
frequency at the band edges. Note that at 18.1 and 18.3 GHz not all
IFs led to a solution. Between these edges, the rms rises linearly
with frequency, with a slope largely determined by the frequency
dependent antenna efficiency.
Those interested in observing outside the traditional VLA K-band
should be aware that only data from EVLA antennas can be used - VLA
antennas will not produce useful data at these frequencies. Also,
JObserve does not support the creation of the required observe files.
Please refer to the 'observe file preparation specifics' and
'subarrays' subsections in the extended C-band section above.
Guidelines for post-processing EVLA data in AIPS
Since August 1, 2006 EVLA antennas have been included in observations
by default. During the post processing of any data including EVLA
antennas there are a number of caveats observers should be aware of.
In any case we strongly recommend users to use the latest version of
AIPS (31DEC07), including running the AIPS midnight job regularly
EVLA antenna positions
Since their inclusion in the array by default, we have obtained
improved EVLA antenna positions over time. This means that the
position of the EVLA antennas (and VLA antennas, for that matter) in
your data may not be the best available one, which can lead to phase
errors. Especially for EVLA antennas, this error may be substantial.
The AIPS task VLANT determines the antenna position corrections
applied by the VLA operations staff after your observation that apply
to that observation. It copies an input CL table and applies these
antenna position corrections to the antenna phases. It is important
that VLANT be run on CL table version 1 immediately after running
FILLM, and prior to any other operation on the CL table. Note that
since VLANT is a new task you must have 31DEC07 AIPS to run
it.
Closure errors
As advertised, 50 MHz continuum observations show closure errors of
around 8% on VLA - EVLA baselines due to non-matched bandpass shapes
between VLA and EVLA antennas. This error becomes much more severe at
narrower bandwidths, and we recommend observing in spectral line mode
for those bandwidths, in which case an initial bandpass calibration
can correct for the non-matched bandpass shapes.
It is common practice to use 'channel 0' as created by FILLM in the
initial calibration stage. On data with VLA - EVLA baselines this
practice is strongly discouraged since the 'channel 0' data now
contain closure errors on VLA - EVLA baselines. Our recommended
solution is to create an alternative 'channel 0' from which closure
errors have been removed. There are two ways to do this: an easy one
which requires an AIPS midnight job (MNJ) after October 1, 2007, and a
more complicated one for older versions of AIPS. The difference is
that in the latest versions of AIPS the task AVSPC allows application
of calibration, which reduces the number of steps required.
- AIPS with no MNJ after October 1, 2007
- Run BPASS on the LINE multi-source dataset, creating a
bandpass (BP) table. Make sure BPASSPRM(5)=0 (the default)
- Apply this BP table using SPLAT, creating a multisource output
file. In SPLAT, make sure to specify DOCAL=0 (which causes CL
table version 1 to be copied to the output file) and
all sources
- Add an index (NX) table to the SPLAT output either by copying
the NX table from the SPLAT input to the SPLAT output using
TACOP, or by running INDXR on the SPLAT output
The first option is easiest, but requires an equal number of
visibilities in input and output; it fails when application of
the BP table in SPLAT leads to visibilities being
flagged
The second option is tricky when pointing scans are included:
standard application of INDXR will merge calibrator scans at
either side of a pointing scan into one, with a possible phase
jump within that scan. In that case, scan boundaries need to
be explicitly specified in INFILE (see EXPLAIN INDXR)
- Use AVSPC to average a number of spectral line channels
together into an alternative 'channel 0' dataset (FILLM uses
the central 75%, which is also the default in AVSPC, but other
choices over a flat section of the bandpass are fine, too).
Channel specification in AVSPC is flexible allowing the user
to omit channels contaminated by line emission or absorption
in the calibrator passband
- Continue the calibration as one normally would (i.e. run CALIB
etc) on the newly created 'channel 0' data
- AIPS with MNJ after October 1, 2007
- Run BPASS on the LINE multi-source dataset, creating a
bandpass (BP) table. Make sure BPASSPRM(5)=0 (the default)
- Use AVSPC to average a number of spectral line channels
together into an alternative 'channel 0' dataset (FILLM uses
the central 75%, which is also the default in AVSPC, but other
choices over a flat section of the bandpass are fine, too).
Channel specification in AVSPC is flexible allowing the user
to omit channels contaminated by line emission or absorption
in the calibrator passband. Apply the BP table using DOBAND=1
and make sure to specify DOCAL=0 (which causes CL table
version 1 to be copied to the output file) and all
sources
- Continue the calibration as one normally would (i.e. run CALIB
etc) on the newly created 'channel 0' data
Doppler tracking
After the Modcomp retirement Doppler tracking works again for all
baselines. However, the potential of phase jumps on VLA - EVLA
baselines, caused by the small frequency changes, remains.
Our recommendation not to use Doppler tracking therefore
remains in effect.
If you did manual Doppler tracking (i.e. calculate the appropriate sky
frequency for every individual scan), no resampling in frequency is
needed. In that case you should have put calibrator scans around each
scan on source to deal with the phase jumps associated with frequency
changes on VLA - EVLA baselines.
During the transition, online Doppler tracking is not recommended in
many cases, for a variety of reasons. In that case, you probably
observed all or most scans with the same frequency, and you may need
to resample your data to a common frequency/velocity axis using the
AIPS task CVEL, and enter the velocity manually using SETJY. Note
that if the line width is narrow compared to the channel spacing,
resampling may result in unwanted sidelobes in frequency (Gibbs
effect), and off-line Hanning smoothing may be needed to suppress
these sidelobes at the price of a loss in frequency resolution.
Removing 25 MHz spectral line artifacts
Data taken in spectral line mode at 25 MHz bandwidth between August
2006 and November 8, 2007 and suffering from the correlator offset
problem can be corrected during post-processing as long as there is no
significant emission in the center of the field.
To this end the AIPS task UVMTH, written in 1989 and then mostly
forgotten, was resurrected. UVMTH time-averages the visibilities in a
uv data set on each baseline and correlator and adds them to,
subtracts them from, multiplies them by, or divides them into the
visibilities in another data set. It was recently revised to apply
all of the data selection, calibration, and flagging options to the
first input uv data set while averaging each baseline and correlator
over all TIMERANG. The result is applied to the second data set which
is read, modified, and written with no application of data selection
(other than sub-array and frequency ID), flagging, or calibration.
For the VLA correlator offset problem (and a similar one sometimes
seen in GMRT data), the user should specify the same data set for both
inputs. SOURCES should select those pointings with no significant
source at the center of the field and FLAGVER should select flags for
at least these sources, but all calibration should be turned off. The
default subtraction operation should be selected.
If you have comments/problems/questions about data from the EVLA
antennas please contact our support
staff.
Modified on Tuesday, 29-Jan-2013 14:45:28 MST by Gustaaf
van Moorsel
|